Stablecoins Should Meet Same Regulations as Real Money, Bank of England
April 15, 2023
In a press conference at the Institute of International Finance in Washington on April 12, Andrew Bailey, governor of the Bank of England, said that stablecoins should be subject to the same regulations as fiat money.
Stablecoins, according to Bailey, lack a “assured value,” which is one of the key qualities that investors desire in this kind of “digital money” that aims to imitate fiat. He contends that as a result, the nation must concentrate on establishing an appropriate, stringent regulatory structure, very comparable to that of conventional financial products:
“As we have seen, they [the stablecoins] do not have assured value, and in the work we have done at the Bank of England we have concluded that the public should expect assured value in digital money, and confidence in this is needed to underpin financial stability.”
Are tokens real money?
Andrew Bailey warned that stablecoins must meet the same characteristics and regulations as real money to function properly. This situation has not yet happened with any stablecoin.
Furthermore, he noted that regulators should consider all appropriate liquidity buffers to respond to any banking crisis or bank run, like the recent one involving Silicon Valley Bank, which affected thousands of investors.
Currently, the Bank of England is following the evolution of digital money to reach a conclusion on the possibility of issuing a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC). Digital money has existed for decades, but the technology used for its management has changed. Blockchain provides a decentralized, auditable way to transfer money in a more efficient way, but centralization is the standard for legal, geopolitical, and, ultimately, practical reasons.
Bailey stated that although digital money should not exist only in the form of CBDCs, it is likely necessary to create an “anchor to the value of all forms of money, including new digital ones, and to ensure the maximum opportunity for innovation in payment services.”
Regulators vs. Stablecoins
As reported by CryptoPotato, Although regulators have been debating stablecoin regulation for a while, they have not yet agreed on the measures that will best safeguard investors. This might be the case because American watchdogs are more concerned with stablecoins’ nefarious applications, such as money laundering and terrorism financing, than with their regular use as digital currency, claims Blockchain Association Executive Director Kristin Smith.
Additionally, she added that cryptocurrencies are “much more transparent than we see in the traditional financial services system.” However, she noted that the crypto market and stablecoins must be adequately regulated to avoid stifling technological innovation.
On the other hand, Jeremy Allaire, CEO of Circle, stated recently that stablecoins should not be regulated by the SEC, as the agency is not qualified to fulfill that role and it is not its responsibility, and there are other custodians in the country better suited for it. Circle is the company behind USDC, the world’s second-largest stablecoin.
